Arid Lands Resource Sciences GIDP and the Transformation Process
Tue, 10/14/2008 - 3:04pm — danistil
Name of proposed new unit, OR Title of submission:
Arid Lands Resource Sciences GIDP and the Transformation Process
156_Arid_Lands_Resource_Sciences_GIDP_and_the_Transformation_Process.pdf
Name of contact person for this proposal: Stuart E. Marsh
Contact person title: Professor and Chair Arid Lands Resource Sciences GIDP
Contact Address:
1955 E. Sixth Street
University of Arizona
Contact Phone: 520-621-8574
Responses from President and Provost
Response #1> Back to List of White Papers
If you do not wish to comment publicly on this site, you may post your comments at uatransf@email.arizona.edu
Comments
The African American
The African American Advisory Council would want to insure that Transformations processes including consolidations and workforce reductions would not erode The University of Arizona's efforts to recruit and retain diverse faculty, students, and staff.
The UA President’s Hispanic
The UA President’s Hispanic Advisory Council (HAC) is pleased to provide its evaluation of this White Paper/Proposal, with the specific goal of relating it to the joint UA/HAC goals concerning diversity and inclusion, recruitment, retention and graduation of Hispanic students and faculty, and on meeting the UA goal of becoming a Hispanic Serving Institution by 2012. Additional criteria used when reviewing this proposal include the following: UA’s land grant institution status and thus its location in the southwest and the changing demographics of this area; innovative program design, including instruction methodologies; and whether the proposal realistically addresses the UA’s business needs. HAC’s mission it to strengthen relationships between the UA and the diverse communities within the State of Arizona by serving as a communications conduit and developing mutually beneficial partnerships.
HAC has reviewed this proposal and rates this as:
Revamp – this proposal does not sufficiently address the Hispanic Advisory Council criteria and should be revamped
Post new comment